Prophetic Authority Without Checks and Balances in New Prophetic Churches in Africa

1. Introduction

Contemporary African Christianity is marked by spectacular growth in Pentecostal and charismatic currents. Within this heterogeneous field, recent literature distinguishes classical Pentecostalism, often structured in denominations with mechanisms of pastoral accountability, from New Prophetic Churches (NPC) and neo-prophetic forms in which authority concentrates on an individual presented as the exclusive channel of divine revelation (Kgatle, 2021; Kaunda, 2020; Banda, 2021; Anderson, 2014).

This distinction is decisive for any serious inquiry. Conflating "evangelical," "Pentecostal," and "cult" obscures both pastoral diagnosis and the justice owed to victims. The object of this article is therefore not Pentecostalism as such, but certain configurations of authority in which the prophet becomes, in practice, beyond reach: beyond synod, beyond a council of elders, beyond biblical fraternal correction. In these configurations, the language of "anointing," "vision," and "revelation" can mask a power asymmetry that exposes believers to financial exploitation, psychological coercion and, in some documented or carefully alleged cases, gender-based violence.

The research question may be formulated as follows: how does the individualisation of sacred authority in certain African NPC produce mechanisms of spiritual hold, and what biblical and ecclesial criteria can historic Protestantism oppose to this drift without denying charism or stigmatising Africa?

This question is not merely academic. It touches concrete lives: believers impoverished by endless "seed" offerings, women disqualified by a spiritual label, families divided by witchcraft diagnoses, consciences that no longer dare examine the Scriptures for fear of being accused of rebellion. It also touches upright Pentecostal and Protestant churches unjustly conflated with excesses that they often combat internally. A research paper worthy of the name must therefore hold together the rigour of sources, the clarity of discernment, and respect for persons.

Three methodological precautions guide the writing. First, separate documented facts from interpretation. Investigations, judicial decisions, commission reports, and peer-reviewed articles are privileged; testimonies and press accounts are treated as indicators to be cross-checked, not as definitive proof. Media-amplified cases (extreme practices, judicial affairs) are evoked with reserve, as illustrations of patterns analysed in the literature, not as generalisable nominative accusations nor as definitive condemnation where the judicial status remains evolving. Second, contextualise without essentialising. Poverty, the fragility of the postcolonial state, witchcraft imaginaries, and the neoliberal religious market operate as vulnerability factors, not as "African nature." Third, read theologically. From the standpoint of historic Protestantism, all authority in the church is ministerial and subject to Scripture (sola Scriptura). A charism that places itself above the Word ceases to be Christian, even when draped in biblical language.

This article belongs to the editorial line of the journal Au cœur du Silence ("At the Heart of Silence") (ntilia.com/u/silence), which has already addressed, in a more pastoral register, diverted anointing, the commercialisation of favour oil, prophecies that decide in the believer's place, and the use of the "Jezebel" label to silence free spirits. It extends those angles in the format of a self-standing academic paper, also suitable for Zenodo deposit.

The plan is as follows. After the method (section 2), the literature review and conceptual framework (section 3) define NPC, "emptied authority," spiritual abuse, commercialisation, and the debate on syncretism. Section 4 situates the phenomenon in the postcolonial context, West Africa, and the diaspora. Section 5 analyses six mechanisms of spiritual hold. Section 6 examines the CRL report (2017) and the regulation / religious-freedom debate. Section 7 sets the counterpoint of institutionalised Pentecostalism and the Protestant tradition. Section 8 proposes biblical criteria of discernment. The discussion (section 9) and conclusion (section 10) draw out the implications.

---

2. Method

2.1. Approach

This study is a qualitative bibliographic synthesis. It does not rest on an original field enquiry, but on the triangulation of secondary academic sources (peer-reviewed journals, monographs), public institutional reports (CRL Rights Commission, South Africa, 2017; French vigilance publications of the Miviludes type, used qualitatively), and a systematic reading of scriptural texts mobilised in the Protestant tradition for the discernment of spirits and ministries.

The approach is at once theological (normative evaluation from Scripture and the principles of the Reformation) and socio-religious (taking into account analyses by African sociologists and theologians of the religious market, commercialisation, and gender dynamics). It belongs to the field of critical Pentecostal studies of the Global South, without claiming encyclopaedic exhaustiveness.

2.2. Source inclusion criteria

Priority was given to:

1. peer-reviewed publications dealing explicitly with New Prophetic Churches / neo-prophetic churches, African neo-Pentecostalism, abuse of spiritual authority, commercialisation of religion, syncretism / contextualisation, or dynamics of prophetic power (notably HTS Teologiese Studies, Stellenbosch Theological Journal, Acta Theologica, In die Skriflig, Verbum et Ecclesia, Pharos Journal of Theology, Religions, Dignity, Springer and Routledge monographs);
2. the CRL report of 2017 on the commercialisation of religion and the abuse of belief systems, a public South African document;
3. the reference literature on spiritual abuse in Christian settings (Oakley, Kinmond & Humphreys, 2018);
4. classical or synthetic works on African Pentecostalism and religious modernity (Meyer, 1999, 2010; Mayrargue, 2004; Mottier, 2014; Anderson, 2014);
5. the biblical texts traditionally mobilised for prophetic and pastoral discernment in Protestantism.

Journalistic sources and autobiographical testimonies (for example narratives of the "Church Mafia" type) enter the analysis only as indicators already taken up and discussed in the academic literature, not as autonomous proof. When a peer-reviewed study itself relies principally on the press (as with Agazue, 2016), that methodological limitation is stated explicitly.

2.3. Limitations

Several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the synthesis privileges southern Africa (especially South Africa), where academic production on NPC is densest; West Africa and the diaspora are treated comparatively but less exhaustively. Second, the absence of an original empirical enquiry prevents quantification of the prevalence of abuse. Third, nominative caution means that individual dossiers are not treated as trials; mechanisms are described as patterns, not as verdicts. Evolving judicial situations (acquittals, appeals) are formulated as such, without being transformed into definitive condemnation. Finally, the Protestant perspective assumed here is not axiologically neutral: it evaluates practices against Scripture and human rights. That position is declared rather than concealed.

2.4. Treatment of media-amplified cases and the press

The period 2015–2020 saw, in South Africa in particular, a series of reports on extreme practices and judicial affairs involving leaders presenting themselves as prophets. Academic literature (Kgatle, Banda, Kaunda, Resane) has taken up these facts as material for structural analysis. In the present article, these cases are not rehearsed as scoops or as individual verdicts. They serve solely to illustrate patterns already conceptualised: individualisation of authority, doctrinal vacuum, commercialisation, gender asymmetry. This caution is not lukewarmness; it is an ethical and legal requirement, coherent with Protestant discernment that refuses generalised trials of intention as much as complicit silence.

2.5. Articulating theology and the social sciences

The synthesis deliberately crosses two registers. The social sciences (sociology of religion, anthropology, gender studies) help to understand why the neo-prophetic offer meets a demand (social compensation, market, re-enchanted modernity, sensational forms in Meyer's sense). Protestant theology helps to evaluate whether and in what respects certain configurations cease to be faithful to the Gospel. Neither register alone is sufficient: a sociology without theological criteria describes without discerning; a theology without social context moralises without understanding. The paper assumes this dual requirement.

---

3. Literature review and conceptual framework

3.1. New Prophetic Churches: an operational definition

NPC, as described notably in South Africa by Kgatle (2021, 2022a) and in the associated literature, are typically characterised by:

• a centralised prophetic figure, often media-facing (emphatic titles of the "Seer," "Major," "Man of God" type);
• a theology of deliverance (curses, witchcraft, family spirits) and of prosperity (sow in order to reap);
• weak institutionalisation of checks and balances (practical absence of independent elders, synod, or disciplinary procedure applicable to the leader);
• a miracle economy: oils, handkerchiefs, holy water, paid consultations, "seeds" meant to unlock blessing;
• media competition around the spectacular sign;
• often anti-organisational ideals that hinder lasting accountability (Kgatle, 2020).

Kgatle (2021), in Pentecostalism and Cultism in South Africa (Springer; book DOI to be confirmed on the Springer notice), analyses the cultic tendencies of some of these churches: personality cult, extreme practices presented as acts of faith, and excesses that do not represent the norm of South African Pentecostalism but constitute a problematic fringe. The literature insists on this point: NPC are not "Pentecostalism" as such; they are a contested expression of it, often in tension with classical denominations (Anderson, 2014; Kgatle & Anderson, 2020).

Terminological precision is important. "Neo-Pentecostal," "Neo-Prophetic," "New Prophetic Churches," and "neo-prophetism" are not always strict synonyms in the literature; they nonetheless designate a family resemblance: centrality of the prophet, deliverance, prosperity, mediatisation, weak accountability. Banda (2021) readily speaks of controversial neo-Pentecostal prophets (NPP). Kgatle often prefers New Prophetic Churches. In this article, NPC serves as an encompassing operational term, without claiming to erase internal nuances.

A further point of vigilance concerns the boundary with "classical" charismatic Pentecostalism. Many African Pentecostal churches practise prophecy, healing, and deliverance without thereby sacralising a unique leader beyond all control. The discriminating criterion is therefore not the presence of charisms, but the structure of power: plurality or monopoly, correction possible or forbidden, written doctrine or total experimentalism, free gift or magical transaction.

3.2. "Emptied authority"

Kaunda (2020) speaks of a modernised and individualised sacred authority. On his analysis, African neo-Pentecostalism has adopted indigenous notions of sacred authority through the paradigm of modernisation, individualising, fragmenting, and fundamentalising them. The result is not increased spiritual freedom but dependence: the believer no longer readily accesses God except through the prophet. By modernising sacred authority, certain neo-Pentecostal expressions have, according to Kaunda, emptied indigenous authority of its regulating virtues (communal bond, relational justice, traditional forms of regulation) while retaining its charge of sacredness. Authority then becomes, in his operational formulation, individualised, unregulated, fundamentalist, unquestionable, unaccountable, and deinstitutionalised (Kaunda, 2020, Acta Theologica; DOI 10.18820/23099089/actat.v40i2.12; UFS mirror 10.38140/at.v40i2.4987).

As a counterpoint, Kaunda proposes a kenotic authority (emptied in the christological sense of self-lowering, Philippians 2:7), centred on service and justice rather than on sacralised male domination. The pastor then becomes a symbolic instrument of a life of service, not the exclusive holder of the divine. This proposal converges, in another vocabulary, with the Protestant requirement of a diaconal and correctable ministry.

This configuration of individualised authority directly contradicts the priesthood of all believers, a cornerstone of the Reformation. The Letter to the Hebrews affirms a single Mediator and free access to the throne of grace (Hebrews 4:14–16; 1 Timothy 2:5). Any structure that restores an exclusive human mediator reconstructs, under charismatic vocabulary, a form of absolutised clericalism. The paradox is striking: movements that often present themselves as anti-clerical (against "dead" churches and their rituals) reproduce, under other garments, an even more absolute concentration of power, for want of synod, written confession, and plurality of elders.

3.3. Spiritual abuse and abuse of spiritual authority

The psycho-pastoral framework of spiritual abuse, developed notably in Anglo-American contexts, offers a transferable grid. Oakley, Kinmond and Humphreys (2018) define spiritual abuse as a form of emotional and psychological abuse characterised by a systematic pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour in a religious context. According to the revised definition proposed by Oakley, such abuse may include: manipulation and exploitation, enforced accountability, censorship of decision-making, requirements of secrecy and silence, coercion into conformity, control through the use of sacred texts or teaching, requirement of obedience to the abuser, suggestion that the abuser occupies a "divine" position, isolation as punishment, and elitism / a sense of superiority.

Orogun and Pillay (2022), in the Stellenbosch Theological Journal, operationalise abuse of spiritual authority in a multi-country African context. Their mixed enquiry (n = 414 respondents, eight African countries) reports that 82% of aggregated responses confirm the perception of human-rights abuse linked to an overestimated "spiritual authority" (spiritual covering, spiritual father/mother). Items concern forced obedience, electoral and matrimonial interference, financial constraint, obstacles to the right to leave the assembly and to demand accountability. This figure should be presented as an empirical perception within the sample, not as a national prevalence rate. The central thesis remains useful: the misappropriation of spiritual authority produces a spiritual authoritarianism incompatible with New Testament theology and with instruments of religious freedom.

Applied to NPC, this dual framework (Oakley; Orogun and Pillay) makes it possible to distinguish a demanding spirituality (freely consented fasting, transparent communal discipline) from a spiritual hold in which fear of God is instrumentalised to produce submission to the leader. Spiritual abuse is not "too much spirituality"; it is the diversion of a sacred asymmetry to the detriment of bodily, financial, and conscientious integrity.

3.4. Commercialisation, competition, and religion as dependence

Ramantswana and Sebetseli (2021) analyse prophetic competition in a commercial age: religious marketing, branding of faith, competition among prophetic "brands," and fraudulent activities facilitated by pressure toward the extraordinary. Mashau and Kgatle (2019) show how the prosperity gospel shapes postcolonial African Christianity and feeds a culture of greed / consumerism, via "break-through handkerchiefs," anointing oils, prayer books, and vows; they propose as an alternative an African Christian theology of Ubuntu. Kgatle (2022b), in "Go deeper papa, prophesy, do something," documents the commodification of prophetic deliverance in South African NPC (tariffed individual consultations, sale of "anointed" objects), underlining a notable departure from the ministerial practices of classical Pentecostalism.

Kgatle and Thinane (2023) propose the metaphor of a transition from the opium of religion to religion as opioids: NPC as "religion in the mix," with points of contact with classical Pentecostalism, African Traditional Religions (ATR), AIC, and the prosperity gospel—a mix sometimes diverted to commercial ends. Resane (2017) adds that theological formation itself can become merchandise (unaccredited institutions, rapid qualifications, celebrity cult), which weakens hermeneutical integrity. Resane (2024) finally links commercialisation and gender-based violence (GBV) in neo-Pentecostal churches.

The CRL report (2017), examined further below, formalised these observations at the South African institutional level.

3.5. Syncretism, ATR, and recompositions (with caution)

A recent academic debate, published notably in Religions, concerns functional continuities between certain NPC practices and elements associated with African Traditional Religions. Kgatle and Ngubane (2023) analyse practices in which some neo-Pentecostal pastors integrate elements associated with the sangoma (ancestral mediation, rituals, objects). Kgatle (2023) compares divine-healing consultations in NPC and in ATR. Mofokeng (2024) invites reconsideration of the syncretism / contextualisation polarity in the face of the "sangoma-prophet" phenomenon.

The editorial rule here is strict. These works are peer-reviewed analyses of alleged or observed practices, not sensational "occultist" proofs. One must distinguish contextualisation / indigenisation (a normal process of local appropriation of Christianity) from doctrinal syncretism (loss of the christocentric criterion). To paint Africa as "occultist" would be a colonial essentialism. From a Protestant standpoint, the problem is not Africanity; it is the replacement of Christ as centre by power, by the object, or by a monetised ancestral diagnosis.

3.6. Conceptual synthesis

The following table synthesises the concepts mobilised.

---

4. Postcolonial African context, West Africa, and diaspora

4.1. Social compensation, modernity, and sensory forms

The work of Birgit Meyer, notably Translating the Devil (1999) on Ewe Christianity in Ghana and "Aesthetics of Persuasion" (2010) on Pentecostalism's sensational forms, shows that these communities often function as institutions of compensation in the face of a failing postcolonial state: health, meaning, solidarity, social mobility. Meyer shows how the figure of the Devil and deliverance rituals make it possible to reformulate local imaginaries within a Christian frame, while mediating the tensions of modernity. Sensational forms help to understand the efficacy of prophetic spectacle (media, bodies, objects) without reducing it at the outset to fraud. To ignore this soil is to moralise in a vacuum. To acknowledge it does not excuse abuse; it explains why the prophetic offer finds a market.

In many urban and peri-urban contexts, the neo-Pentecostal prophet may occupy, functionally, a place once held by the diviner-healer: invisible diagnosis, ritual remedy, protection against witchcraft, promise of success. This functional continuity does not imply theological identity; it reveals a social demand that formal institutions (state, hospital, missionary church) have not always met.

The neoliberal religious market, with its competition of signs and its mediatisation, amplifies these dynamics without inventing them (Ramantswana & Sebetseli, 2021; Mashau & Kgatle, 2019). To say this is not to relativise abuse; it is to refuse the racist or culturalist explanation that would make "the African" a naturally gullible being.

4.2. Southern Africa

In southern Africa, NPC have received particular media and academic attention since the mid-2010s, notably around extreme practices reported in hearings and the press (ingestion of dangerous substances, humiliating rituals) and judicial affairs touching on sexual exploitation. These cases, widely taken up in the literature (Kgatle, 2021; Banda, 2021; Kaunda, 2020; Resane, 2024), do not define South African Pentecostalism; they illustrate the absence of safeguards when authority is no longer correctable. They must be treated as reports / media-amplified cases / analytical material, not as the NPC norm.

Concerning nominative affairs, caution is required. The Timothy Omotoso case (Jesus Dominion International), used by Kaunda (2020) as a case study of gendered sacralised authority during the period of prosecution, illustrates a configuration of authority; it must not be presented as definitive condemnation. According to judicial and press sources available at the time of writing, Omotoso was arrested in 2017, acquitted with his co-accused by the High Court Eastern Cape (Gqeberha) on 2 April 2025 (reported ground: the State had not proved beyond reasonable doubt), and the NPA subsequently obtained leave to appeal (2026); the acquittal had not been overturned as of the sources consulted. To formulate otherwise would betray the evolving judicial status. Likewise, media controversies around spectacular filmed miracles (for example "resurrections" widely discussed in 2019) illustrate the economy of spectacle and competitive pressure, without constituting by themselves a definitive criminal condemnation in the open sources consulted; the present article therefore privileges pattern analysis (spectacle, competition) rather than nominative verdict.

4.3. West Africa (Mayrargue)

In West Africa, Mayrargue (2004) distinguishes the historical trajectories of Pentecostalism (early missionary implantation, indigenisation, transnationalisation, social and political investment) from contemporary recompositions centred on healing and deliverance. The historical presence of the Assemblies of God, for example in Burkina Faso from the 1920s according to historical literature, recalls that there exists an institutionalised West African Pentecostalism distinct from media-facing neo-prophetic figures. One must therefore avoid mechanically importing the "South African NPC" grid without local sources. West African Pentecostalism is not monolithic; its institutionalised forms have often developed structures of accountability absent among certain media neo-prophets.

4.4. Diaspora France (Mottier) and behavioural vigilance

Mottier (2014) offers an ethnography of the failure of an African Pentecostal church in Île-de-France (about 60 members), founded by a Congolese pastor-prophet: rivalries of seduction, witchcraft accusation among women, tension between spiritual kinship and carnal kinship, implosion of charismatic authority. This case is valuable for Francophone readers: it shows the fragility, not the invincibility, of prophetic authority, as well as the possible continuity of mechanisms of spiritual hold outside the continent.

In France, Miviludes does not evaluate dogmas; it flags behaviours (spiritual hold, family rupture, financial demands, abandonment of care). Reports concern certain small evangelical or Pentecostal assemblies (pastoral self-proclamation, exorcisms, staged healings), without confessional conflation. The present article confines itself to this qualitative reading and does not cite fine figures from recent reports without verified extraction from the official PDF. The editorial rule remains: speak of reported behavioural excesses, never of "African churches in France."

Without essentialising, one may formulate a cautious hypothesis: where social vulnerability meets a competitive religious offer and non-accountable charismatic authority, the risk of spiritual hold increases, whatever the continent and the confession. Problematic NPC occupy a media-visible place precisely because they shock; they summarise neither Africa nor Pentecostalism. The stake is to name a fringe, not to paint a continent.

---

5. Analysis of mechanisms of spiritual hold

On the basis of the literature and carefully framed media-amplified cases, six recurrent mechanisms emerge. Each is presented with bibliographic anchorage and a brief Protestant biblical reading.

5.1. Prophetic asymmetry

The leader presents himself as God's exclusive channel. To contest an instruction then becomes a "rebellious spirit," "Jezebel," or demonisation. Critique is no longer an ecclesial right; it is pathologised. Yet Scripture precisely commands examination: "Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God" (1 John 4:1). The Bereans, far from being blamed, are praised for examining the Scriptures daily to verify the teaching they received (Acts 17:11).

In the literature, this asymmetry is linked to the individualisation of authority (Kaunda, 2020) and to the abuse of spiritual authority analysed by Orogun and Pillay (2022). When the leader's position is presented as "divine" in Oakley's sense (unquestionable obedience, sacred texts as a tool of control), communal discernment disappears. Kgatle (2022a) adds the mechanism of blame-shifting: when the prophetic "solution" fails, blame is shifted onto the believer (lack of faith, of prayer, of giving), which maintains the asymmetry.

Pastorally, asymmetry is recognisable in stock phrases: "Touch not the Lord's anointed," "God told me that you must…," "If you doubt, you are under the influence of…." Yet the narrative of David and Saul, often diverted to forbid all critique, abolishes neither the law nor the prophets who confronted kings. Nathan confronts David; Paul confronts Peter (Galatians 2). Biblical anointing is never a licence of impunity. From a Protestant standpoint, a leader who refuses all accountability places himself outside the New Testament model of elders (Titus 1:5–9).

5.2. Fear and deliverance

The diagnosis of possession, generational curse, or family witchcraft isolates the believer from his or her support network and renders him or her dependent on the "prophet-therapist." Fear replaces evangelical repentance. Where the Gospel liberates (John 8:32, 36), a theology of spiritual terror enslaves.

Kgatle (2022a) shows that NPC readily link illness, unemployment, sterility, and the like to the world of spirits (uthakathiwe, "you are bewitched") rather than to socio-historical causes. Meyer (1999, 2010) has shown the structuring role of deliverance and sensory forms in African Pentecostalism as a response to occult forces and the anxieties of modernity. It is not deliverance as such that poses a problem (the New Testament knows exorcism and healing), but its instrumentalisation: when every failure is attributed to a spirit of which only the prophet holds the key, the believer loses access to other resources (medicine, justice, plural pastoral counsel). Jeremiah 23:16–17 warns against prophets who say "peace" or who speak "from their own hearts" without having been sent.

The fear mechanism often operates in three stages. First, a totalising diagnosis. Second, a monopolised solution ("only my prayers / my oil / my fast can deliver you"). Third, an implicit or explicit threat ("if you leave, the spirits will return stronger"). This schema corresponds closely to the coercive pattern described by Oakley et al. (2018).

5.3. Financial transaction

The "sow / reap" logic transforms giving into a magical investment. The CRL report (2017, §15.1) documents cases in which substantial sums are required before prayers and blessings, water and oils are sold at high prices, access to the leader is paid, objects (T-shirts, towels, and the like) are sold as luck-bearers, and bank terminals (speed points) take immediate payments during ceremonies. Mashau and Kgatle (2019), Kgatle (2022b), and Resane (2024) confirm the financial exploitation of the most vulnerable in certain neo-prophetic milieux.

This radically contradicts Jesus's teaching on trafficking in the sacred (Matthew 21:12–13) and Peter's warning against those who, "in their greed… exploit you with false words" (2 Peter 2:3). In the Protestant tradition, free and joyful giving (2 Corinthians 9) is never a merchandised sacrament nor a purchase of divine favour. A spirituality that must constantly be redeemed is no longer grace (cf. the critical metaphor of "opioids" in Kgatle and Thinane, 2023).

5.4. Spectacle and celebrity

Filmed miracles, emphatic titles, pressure to produce the extraordinary: spectacle becomes proof. Yet Jesus refuses to found faith on the spectacular sign demanded as a condition (Matthew 12:39; cf. John 20:29). Matthew 24:24 warns against false christs and false prophets who will produce "great signs and wonders."

Meyer (2010) provides a framework for understanding persuasion via material, media, and bodily forms, without reducing everything to fraud. Ramantswana and Sebetseli (2021) underline market competition: the more extraordinary the sign must be to capture attention, the greater the pressure to escalate. Media controversies around spectacular miracles (widely discussed in the press and taken up as illustrations in NPC literature) belong to this economy of spectacle; they must be cited as controversies / allegations, not as definitive condemnations where these are not established. 2 Timothy 4:3–4 and 2 Corinthians 11:13–15 call for critical sobriety in the face of the itch for the spectacular and of false apostles.

5.5. Gender, body, and sexuality

Agazue (2016), in Dignity, documents patterns of sexual exploitation under the pretext of "spiritual cleansing" / deliverance in Nigeria. Methodological limitation to declare: the article relies principally on press reports; each press affair remains an allegation until judgment. The academic contribution retained is the analytical pattern (competition among prophets, gendered demonic fear, diagnosis of intimate parts followed by a sexual "purification" presented as God's will), not generalisation to all of Nigerian Pentecostalism.

Kaunda (2020) analyses sexualisation and gendered exploitation in a configuration of non-accountable masculine sacred authority, on the basis of a case study constructed around a judicial affair then in progress (see §4.2 for subsequent status). Resane (2024) shows that women are predominantly victims of commercial religious practices (matrimonial expectations, sterility, divorce, exclusion from leadership, finances) and denounces the cult of male celebrity / apotheosis of the leader.

The "Jezebel" label, already analysed in the pastoral register of Silence, then functions as a silencing tool: any woman who resists is spiritually disqualified. The Gospel affirms the equal dignity of women and men created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27) and united in Christ (Galatians 3:28). It condemns the abuse of sexual power as grave sin (1 Thessalonians 4:3–7). A ministry that instrumentalises the bodies of believers in the name of the Spirit contradicts the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22–23) and the model of the shepherd who does not dominate (1 Peter 5:2–3).

5.6. Extreme practices of "faith"

In South Africa, the literature on NPC has described extreme practices (ingestion of dangerous substances, humiliating rituals, use of toxic products presented as acts of obedience) analysed as cultic excesses / absences of safeguards (Kgatle, 2021; Banda, 2021). These cases, often drawn from CRL hearings and media reports, do not define Pentecostalism; they illustrate what becomes possible when authority is no longer correctable and when experience replaces doctrine.

Banda (2021) insists on the protective role of doctrine: without a critical theological frame, experience becomes law, and the law of experience may demand ingestion of the dangerous or humiliation of the weak in the name of faith (doctrinally vacuous experientialism). Ezekiel 34:2–4 condemns shepherds who feed themselves and who have ruled "with force and harshness." Matthew 7:21–23 recalls that invoking the Name and even miracles do not suffice if one practises lawlessness. Deuteronomy 18:20–22 and Jeremiah 23 already offer a biblical grammar for refusing this slide.

---

6. The CRL Rights Commission report (2017) and the regulation / religious-freedom debate

6.1. Context and mandate

The Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities (CRL Rights Commission) is a South African "Chapter 9" institution. Following media reports on controversial practices in certain charismatic and Pentecostal churches, it conducted, from 2015–2016, an enquiry into the commercialisation of religion and the abuse of belief systems. The final report (2017), Report of the hearings on the commercialisation of religion and abuse of people's belief systems, is a public document.

6.2. Principal findings (prima facie)

The report concludes that there is prima facie evidence of commercialisation of religion (§15.1). Among examples reported at the hearings:

• requirement of substantial sums before blessings and prayers;
• sale of holy water and oils at heavily marked-up prices;
• access to the spiritual leader conditioned on a fixed payment;
• sale of objects (T-shirts, towels, Vaseline, etc.) presented as luck-bearers;
• use of bank terminals (speed points) during ceremonies for immediate deduction.

The report also points to problems of legal compliance (NPO / PBO registration, reporting, taxation, cash movements) and of governance (absence of codes of conduct, church councils, disciplinary committees; one-person control, sometimes described as leader and close associates). These findings do not bear on "Christianity" or even on "Pentecostalism" as a bloc: they bear on practices observed in a sample of institutions summoned.

6.3. Recommendations and constitutional debate

The Commission recommended forms of framing (registration of religious practitioners, accredited umbrella structures, codes of conduct, tax investigations), often presented in the language of sectoral self-regulation / peer review. These proposals provoked a lively debate: protecting believers against exploitation, on one side; preserving constitutional religious freedom, on the other.

Banda (2019), in Verbum et Ecclesia, offers a critical Christian reading of the CRL report: behind the language of "self-regulation," he identifies risks of state control and of a secularist approach to religion. The tension between religious freedom and protection of the vulnerable must be treated with nuance, without denying the reality of abuses established prima facie.

6.4. Ecumenical self-regulation (Kgatle, Banda)

Kgatle (2022c), in In die Skriflig, argues, from a theory of ecclesiastical freedom, that ecumenical bodies are better placed than the state to address internal abuses in NPC. He proposes that NPC develop their own accountability structures, which may then articulate with national bodies such as the South African Council of Churches. The state, on this view, accompanies and facilitates rather than governing confessional content.

Banda (2021) critiques the operational theological framework of certain controversial neo-prophets and argues for critical doctrine as the security of believers. Doctrine here is not an anti-Spirit straitjacket; it is a safeguard that protects the weakest. Resane (2017) complements this by underlining that the commercialisation of theological formation precisely weakens that security.

From a Protestant standpoint, this debate rejoins an ancient conviction: freedom of conscience is not freedom to exploit. The church must be able to discipline itself; the state may sanction criminal offences (fraud, sexual violence, endangerment) without dictating dogma.

Three stakes remain open. First stake: the effectiveness of self-regulation. If NPC refuse to create credible organs of accountability, the argument of ecclesial freedom rings hollow for victims. Second stake: formation. Without catechesis and without critical biblical reading, the field is free for dangerous experimentalism. Third stake: protection of whistleblowers inside communities. Without reporting procedures independent of the accused leader, self-regulation remains theoretical.

---

7. Counterpoint, institutionalised Pentecostalism, and the Protestant tradition

7.1. Comparative table (ideal type)

The present article does not impute to classical Pentecostalism the excesses documented in certain New Prophetic Churches. On the contrary, the literature (Kgatle, Resane, Banda, Anderson) shows that institutionalisation, formation, and discipline constitute protective factors, imperfect but structurally distinct.

These safeguards are not magical; abuses also exist in denominations. But their existence changes the structure of power: a pastor can be suspended, a teaching contested, a victim heard outside the leader's circle.

7.2. Four Protestant pillars

Faced with NPC asymmetry, the historic Protestant tradition opposes at least four pillars.

1. Sola Scriptura. Every revelation, vision, or "prophetic word" is subject to Scripture. Galatians 1:8 is radical: even an angel from heaven who would announce another gospel is anathema. 2 Timothy 3:16–17 affirms the normative character of Scripture for teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness.

2. Priesthood of all believers. All believers have access to God through Christ. 1 Timothy 2:5: "For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." Hebrews 4:14–16 invites one to approach "with confidence" the throne of grace. 1 John 2:20, 27 speaks of the anointing that believers have received: anointing is not the monopoly of a guru.

3. Plurality and ministerial responsibility. Titus 1:5–9 and Acts 15 show a church in which elders are plural and major decisions are collective. 1 Peter 5:2–3 requires shepherding the flock "not under compulsion," "not for shameful gain," "not domineering," but being examples.

4. Communal discernment. 1 Thessalonians 5:21: "Test everything; hold fast what is good." Deuteronomy 18:20–22 provides a classical criterion of the false prophet. Jeremiah 23:25–32 denounces those who say "I have dreamed" and who make the people err.

These pillars do not exclude charismatic gifts; they situate them. A biblical prophet can be corrected; a Pauline apostle submits to confrontation (Galatians 2). A leader who places himself beyond all correction no longer acts according to the New Testament model. This posture converges with the kenotic authority proposed by Kaunda (2020) and with the christocentric call of Kgatle (2022a).

7.3. What this changes in practice

In practice, a Protestant or institutionalised Pentecostal community that takes these pillars seriously will put in place, for example: a council of elders genuinely independent of the founder; a written disciplinary procedure applicable to the senior pastor; minimal financial transparency; biblical formation that teaches discernment (1 John 4:1) rather than obedience alone; an explicit refusal to sell access to prayer. These measures do not guarantee holiness; they reduce the structural probability of spiritual hold.

A word must also be said about anointing. In certain neo-prophetic milieux, anointing becomes merchandise (favour oil, "transfer") or a monopoly. Yet 1 John 2:20, 27 affirms that believers have received the anointing of the Holy One. This does not abolish ministries; it prevents a single man from arrogating control of access to God. Diverted anointing, a theme already treated in the pastoral register of Au cœur du Silence, finds here its academic and scriptural anchorage: diverted, it ceases to be gift and becomes an instrument of power.

---

8. Biblical criteria of discernment

Faced with an authority that calls itself prophetic, historic Protestantism proposes neither anti-charismatic cynicism nor naivety. It proposes criteria.

8.1. Pastoral development of the criteria

Submission to Scripture. Any "prophetic word" that contradicts the Gospel (justification by grace, dignity of the person, prohibition of exploitation) must be rejected, whatever signs accompany it.

False prophet. The Deuteronomic criterion (fulfilment) and the Jeremianic criterion (origin of the word) invite communal memory: one notes what has been announced, one verifies, one refuses media amnesia.

Fruit. Matthew 7:15–20 compares false prophets to wolves in sheep's clothing; one recognises them by their fruits. Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control (Galatians 5:22–23) are more reliable indicators than volume of sound or the number of filmed "miracles."

Shepherds. Ezekiel 34 and 1 Peter 5 condemn pastoral predation. A ministry that systematically enriches itself on the precariousness of believers, that humiliates or isolates, places itself under this judgment.

Plurality. A church in which no one can correct the leader is structurally dangerous. Titus 1 requires elders who are above reproach, not arrogant, not greedy.

Anointing of believers. Against the monopoly of anointing, 1 John 2 affirms that believers have received the anointing of the Holy One. This does not abolish ministries; it prevents a single man from appropriating control of them.

Freedom of conscience. Total control over marriage, personal finances, the body, and social relations is a major warning signal of spiritual abuse (Oakley et al., 2018; Orogun & Pillay, 2022).

Access to Christ. Any structure that restores an exclusive human mediator contradicts Hebrews and 1 Timothy 2:5.

Examination. To test the spirits is not insubordination; it is a commandment. The Bereans are a model, not a counter-example.

The spectacular. The itch for the spectacular (2 Timothy 4) and satanic disguise as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11) call for critical sobriety.

These criteria rejoin what academic literature names accountability and human rights: a spiritual authority that denies the believer's fundamental rights (bodily integrity, freedom of conscience, legitimate property) no longer acts in the name of Christ, even if it invokes his Name (Matthew 7:21–23).

8.2. Communal mode of use

These criteria are not meant to feed an inverted witch-hunt. They are meant to equip communities. A local church can, for example, display them in a welcome booklet, teach them in a discipleship course, mobilise them when a member reports financial pressure or an intrusive prophecy about marriage. They also allow fraternal dialogue with charismatic brothers and sisters: one does not ask them to deny gifts, one asks them to test them. 1 Thessalonians 5:19–21 holds both together: "Do not quench the Spirit… but test everything."

Finally, these criteria also protect faithful pastors. A ministry subject to Scripture, plurality, and transparency has nothing to fear from examination. It is monopolies that dread the light. In this sense, Protestant discernment is not anti-authority; it is anti-spiritual absolutism.

---

9. Discussion

9.1. Implications for human rights

The mechanisms analysed touch human rights directly: freedom of conscience, bodily integrity, protection against financial and sexual exploitation, the right to information and critique. Orogun and Pillay (2022) underline precisely this impact on human rights in a multi-country sample. From a Protestant standpoint, the defence of these rights is not an imported "secular humanism"; it flows from biblical anthropology (Genesis 1:27) and the commandment to love one's neighbour.

The CRL report (2017) showed that a public institution can establish commercialisation prima facie without thereby resolving the freedom / protection dilemma. For churches, this implies a responsibility of their own: not waiting for the state to do the work of ecclesial discipline. For the state, this implies sanctioning criminal offences wherever they exist, including under religious cover, without undertaking to define orthodoxy. The balance is delicate; it is nonetheless practicable once one refuses two extremes, absolute laissez-faire and state confessional control (Banda, 2019; Kgatle, 2022c).

9.2. Pastoral implications

For pastors, chaplains, accompanists, and local communities (including in diaspora), several paths emerge:

• form people in discernment without demonising every charism;
• offer spaces of speech where victims are not immediately accused of a "spirit of rebellion";
• refuse the commercialisation of spiritual goods (oils, paid consultations as a condition of access to God);
• collaborate, where appropriate, with protection mechanisms (mental health, justice) when criminal offences are at stake;
• clearly distinguish classical Pentecostalism and NPC excesses in public communication, so as not to wound unjustly upright charismatic brothers and sisters;
• take into account, in diaspora, the possible fragility of charismatic authority (Mottier, 2014) and behavioural reports without ethnic or confessional conflation.

On the plane of personal reconstruction, persons exiting a spiritual hold presented as "anointing" often need to relearn that God is not the leader, that critique is not a demon, and that grace is not for sale. The "Jezebel" label, when it has served to silence, must be explicitly disarmed: resisting a spiritual hold is not rebellion against the Spirit; it is sometimes obedience to the commandment to test the spirits (1 John 4:1).

9.3. A Protestant reading

The Protestant reading proposed here is neither anti-Pentecostal nor anti-African. It is anti-hold. It affirms that the Holy Spirit does not need a human monopoly in order to speak, that Scripture remains the norm, and that the fruit of the Spirit is the best test of authentic anointing. It rejoins, on the ethical plane, African academic calls for kenotic authority (Kaunda), protective doctrine (Banda), ecumenical accountability (Kgatle), and a theology of Ubuntu against a culture of greed (Mashau & Kgatle).

9.4. Limitations of the study (reminder)

This synthesis does not quantify prevalence, does not adjudicate individual dossiers, and remains dependent on available literature (especially South African). Mixed empirical enquiries would be needed to refine the regional diagnosis. Voluntary nominative caution leaves outside the field affairs still in progress or whose judicial status is evolving (acquittals, appeals). Studies based principally on the press (Agazue, 2016) are mobilised for their patterns, with declared limitation. Fine figures from vigilance reports not extracted from the official PDF are not taken up. The reader is invited to cross-check press, judicial decisions (SAFLII where appropriate), and academic work before any personal citation.

---

10. Conclusion

New Prophetic Churches and African neo-prophetic forms are not reducible to a caricature. They respond to real needs for meaning, healing, and solidarity in contexts of postcolonial vulnerability. But where prophetic authority concentrates without checks and balances, academic literature and the CRL report (2017) document patterns of abuse—financial, psychological, sometimes sexual—that violate both human rights and the Gospel.

From the standpoint of Protestant Christianity, the response is neither complicit silence nor fear of "touch not the anointed." It is the return to Christ as sole Mediator (1 Timothy 2:5; Hebrews 4:14–16), to Scripture as norm (2 Timothy 3:16–17; Galatians 1:8), to the priesthood of all believers and the anointing of believers (1 John 2:20, 27), and to a church in which no leader is above correction (Titus 1; 1 Peter 5; Acts 17:11). Distinguishing classical Pentecostalism from NPC excesses is not a rhetorical detail: it is a requirement of justice toward victims and toward faithful charismatic communities.

"Test everything; hold fast what is good" (1 Thessalonians 5:21). "Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits" (1 John 4:1). Such remains, for historic Protestantism, the golden rule of discernment in the face of any authority that calls itself prophetic.

Ultimately, the challenge is not to eliminate the prophetic from contemporary African Christianity. The challenge is to subject it, like every ministry, to the cross, to Scripture, and to fraternal correction. Where that subjection exists, charism builds up. Where it is lacking, prophetic authority without checks and balances becomes, according to the patterns documented by the literature and by the CRL report, a machine of spiritual hold. Protestantism has the theological resources to say so without hatred and without naivety. What remains is to dare to mobilise them, in Africa as in diaspora, in the service of the least.

---

Sources

Academic and institutional sources (alphabetical order)

• Agazue, C. (2016). "He Told Me that My Waist and Private Parts Have Been Ravaged by Demons:" Sexual Exploitation of Female Church Members by "Prophets" in Nigeria. Dignity, 1(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.23860/dignity.2016.01.01.10 (limitation: method based principally on the press)
• Anderson, A. H. (2014). An Introduction to Pentecostalism: Global Charismatic Christianity (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Banda, C. (2019). Redefining religion? A critical Christian reflection on CRL Rights Commission's proposal to regulate religion in South Africa. Verbum et Ecclesia, 40(1), a1948. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v40i1.1948
• Banda, C. (2021). Doctrine as security? A systematic theological critique of the operational theological framework of the controversial South African neo-Pentecostal prophets. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4), a6579. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6579
• CRL Rights Commission (2017). Report of the hearings on the commercialisation of religion and abuse of people's belief systems. Republic of South Africa. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201708/report-commecializationofreligionandabuseofpeoplesbelievesystems.pdf
• Kaunda, C. J. (2020). "The emptied authority": African Neo-Pentecostalism, modernisation of sacred authority, and gendered and sexualised constructions of violence. Acta Theologica, 40(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.18820/23099089/actat.v40i2.12 (mirror: https://doi.org/10.38140/at.v40i2.4987)
• Kgatle, M. S. (2020). Towards a balancing act between the emergence of prophetic churches and organisational culture in South African Pentecostalism. Verbum et Ecclesia, 41(1), a2118. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v41i1.2118
• Kgatle, M. S. (2021). Pentecostalism and Cultism in South Africa. Springer. Publisher notice: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-69724-2 (book DOI to be confirmed on Springer notice)
• Kgatle, M. S. (2022a). Power dynamics among Pentecostal prophets in New Prophetic Churches: An African Christocentric missional approach. Pharos Journal of Theology, 103(2). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.103.2016
• Kgatle, M. S. (2022b). 'Go deeper papa, prophesy, do something': The popularity and commercialisation of prophetic deliverance in African Pentecostalism. Verbum et Ecclesia, 43(1), a2480. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v43i1.2480
• Kgatle, M. S. (2022c). The role of ecumenical bodies in curbing abuses in New Prophetic Churches in South Africa. In die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi, 56(1), a2901. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v56i1.2901
• Kgatle, M. S. (2023). Consultations in New Prophetic Churches and African Traditional Religions: A Case Study of Divine Healing in Assessing Syncretistic Practices in the South African Context. Religions, 14(3), 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030400
• Kgatle, M. S., & Anderson, A. H. (eds.) (2020). The Use and Abuse of the Spirit in Pentecostalism: A South African Perspective. Routledge.
• Kgatle, M. S., & Ngubane, S. E. (2023). Sangomas on the Pulpit: Syncretistic Practices of Some Pastors in Neo-Pentecostal Ministries in South Africa. Religions, 14(12), 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14121499
• Kgatle, M. S., & Thinane, J. S. (2023). Transition from the Opium of Religion to Religion as Opioids: Abuse of Religious Teachings in the New Prophetic Churches in South Africa. Journal for the Study of Religion, 36(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3027/2023/v36n1a4
• Mashau, T. D., & Kgatle, M. S. (2019). Prosperity gospel and the culture of greed in post-colonial Africa: Constructing an alternative African Christian Theology of Ubuntu. Verbum et Ecclesia, 40(1), a1901. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v40i1.1901
• Mayrargue, C. (2004). Trajectoires et enjeux contemporains du pentecôtisme en Afrique de l'Ouest. Critique internationale, 22, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.022.0095
• Meyer, B. (1999). Translating the Devil: Religion and Modernity among the Ewe in Ghana. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474471008
• Meyer, B. (2010). Aesthetics of Persuasion: Global Christianity and Pentecostalism's Sensational Forms. South Atlantic Quarterly, 109(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2010-015
• Miviludes. Activity reports (vigilance against sectarian excesses, behavioural approach). https://www.miviludes.interieur.gouv.fr/nos-ressources/nos-publications/rapports-dactivite-de-miviludes
• Mofokeng, T. R. (2024). Reconsidering Syncretism and Contextualization: The sangoma-Prophet Phenomenon in South African Neo-Prophetic Pentecostalism. Religions, 15(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010084
• Mottier, D. (2014). Le prophète, les femmes, le diable. Ethnographie de l'échec d'une Église pentecôtiste africaine en France. Sociologie, 5(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.3917/socio.032.0163
• Oakley, L., Kinmond, K., & Humphreys, J. (2018). Spiritual abuse in Christian faith settings: definition, policy and practice guidance. The Journal of Adult Protection, 20(3/4), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-03-2018-0005
• Orogun, D., & Pillay, J. (2022). The abuse of spiritual authority among some African Neo-Pentecostals and its impact on human rights. Stellenbosch Theological Journal, 8(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2022.v8n1.a17
• Ramantswana, H. (2019). Prophets praying for, or preying on people's faith: A reflection on prophetic ministry in the South African context. In die Skriflig, 53(4), a2495. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v53i4.2495
• Ramantswana, H., & Sebetseli, I. (2021). Prophets competing against each other in a commercial age: Have some prophets or neoprophetic churches gone too far? HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4), a6340. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6340
• Resane, K. T. (2017). Commercialisation of theological education as a challenge in the Neo-Pentecostal Charismatic churches. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 73(3), a4548. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i3.4548
• Resane, K. T. (2024). Gender Based Violence in the Commercialisation of Religion in Neo-Pentecostal Churches. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(2). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.232

Scriptural sources cited in the body

Deuteronomy 18:20–22; Jeremiah 23:16–17, 25–32; Ezekiel 34:2–4; Genesis 1:27; Matthew 7:15–23; Matthew 12:39; Matthew 21:12–13; Matthew 24:24; John 8:32, 36; John 20:29; Acts 15; Acts 17:11; Romans 14; 1 Corinthians 10; 1 Corinthians 12–14; 2 Corinthians 9; 2 Corinthians 11:13–15; Galatians 1:8; Galatians 2; Galatians 3:28; Galatians 5:22–23; Philippians 2:7; 1 Thessalonians 4:3–7; 1 Thessalonians 5:19–21; 1 Timothy 2:5; 2 Timothy 3:16–17; 2 Timothy 4:3–4; Titus 1:5–9; Hebrews 4:14–16; 1 Peter 5:2–3; 1 John 2:20, 27; 1 John 4:1; 2 Peter 2:3.